NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / September 23, 2020 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Staar Surgical Company (NASDAQ:STAA)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/staar-surgical-company-loss-submission-form?prid=9529&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 19, 2020
Class Period: February 26, 2020 - August 10, 2020
Allegations against STAA include that: the Company was overstating and/or mischaracterizing: (1) its sales and growth in China; (2) its marketing spend; (3) its research and development expenses; and that as a result of the foregoing, (4) Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Alteryx, Inc. (NYSE:AYX)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/alteryx-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=9529&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 19, 2020
Class Period: May 6, 2020 - August 6, 2020
Allegations against AYX include that: (1) the Company was unable to close large deals within the quarter, and deals were pushed out to subsequent quarters or downsized; (2) as a result, Alteryx increasingly relied on adoption licenses to attract new customers; (3) as a result and due to the nature of adoption licenses, the Company's revenue was reasonably likely to decline; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Coty Inc. (NYSE:COTY)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/coty-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=9529&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: November 3, 2020
Class Period: October 3, 2016 - May 28, 2020
Allegations against COTY include that: (1) despite being no stranger to beauty brand acquisitions, Coty did not have adequate processes and procedures in place to assess and properly value the P&G Specialty Beauty Business and Kylie Cosmetics acquisitions; (2) as a result, Coty had overpaid for the P&G Specialty Beauty Business and Kylie Cosmetics; (3) Coty did not have adequate infrastructure to smoothly integrate and support the beauty brands that it acquired from P&G, including an adequate supply chain; (4) as a result of its inadequate infrastructure, Coty was not successfully integrating the beauty brands it acquired from P&G and not delivering synergies from the acquisition; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Coty's financial statements and Defendants' statements about Coty's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected] or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong