NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / January 22, 2020 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQGM:ADMS)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/adamas-pharmaceuticals-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=5330&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 10, 2020
Class Period: August 8, 2017 to September 30, 2019
Allegations against ADMS include that: (1) health insurers were excluding Adamas's primary product, GOCOVRI, from their prescription formularies or requiring patients to use "step therapy" - i.e., making patients try immediate-release amantadine prior to covering GOCOVRI; (2) the rapid increase in physicians prescribing GOCOVRI during the Class Period was not due to its efficacy; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, the Company's financial statements about Adamas's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
X Financial (NYSE:XYF)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/x-financial-loss-submission-form?prid=5330&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 7, 2020
Class Period: X Financial American Depositary Shares pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's September 19, 2018 initial public offering.
Allegations against XYF include that: (i) the Company's total loan facilitation amount was not growing, but rather was contracting; (ii) the number of investors actively using X Financial's platform was shrinking; (iii) demand from small- and medium-sized enterprises for the Company's preferred loans was plummeting; (iv) the Company's preferred loans had performed so poorly that it had begun drastically scaling back its preferred loans in the first quarter of 2018, several months before the initial public offering ("IPO"), and was in the process of phasing out such loans completely; (v) demand for the Company's card loans was also plummeting; (vi) the revenue and loan facilitation growth provided in the registration statement leading up to the IPO was achieved by relaxed credit and due diligence standards, under which the Company had underwritten tens of millions of dollars' worth of poor quality loans that suffered from a disproportionately high risk of default as compared to the Company's earlier loan vintages; (vii) the Company was suffering from accelerated delinquency rates from poor quality loans that it had underwritten in the first, second, and third quarters of 2018, which had caused the Company's delinquency rate to sharply rise; (viii) the Company's product mix had significantly deteriorated; (ix) the Company's net revenue was on track to decline by 22% during the third quarter of 2018; and (x) as a result, the Registration Statement was materially false and/or misleading and failed to state information required to be stated therein.
Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ:BZUN)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/baozun-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=5330&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 10, 2020
Class Period: Baozun American Depository Receipts between March 6, 2019 and November 20, 2019
Allegations against BZUN include that: (a) Baozun was heavily reliant upon a single brand partner, Huawei, for the exponential service fee growth it had been reporting historically, which was in turn fueling its historical revenue growth; (b) compared to other brands Baozun had as brand partners, the Huawei work had historically included a lot of additional add-on service fees, increasing the revenue reported from Huawei vis-a-via its other brand partners; (c) Huawei, like other large brands, was actively preparing to bring its online merchandising in-house, meaning Baozun knew that it was losing a significant brand partner; and (d) as a result of the foregoing, the Company was not on track to achieve the financial results and performance Defendants claimed the Company was on track to achieve during the class period.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected] or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong